Gold or Mold: van Hove’s Crucible Revival

The fact that Saoirse Ronan was starring as Abigail Williams in Ivo van Hove’s stage revival of Arthur Miller’s The Crucible was all I needed to know about the Broadway production Salem Witch Trial story before begging my mom to buy tickets. For those of you who are not familiar with Ivo van Hove, he is the visionary behind the groundbreaking resurrection of another Miller classic: The Glass Menagerie. This production was acclaimed by critics and audiences alike, so it’s no wonder that van Hove’s Crucible was so eagerly anticipated.

When I actually went to see the show, it was still in previews. Nonetheless, the theater was packed. I suppose that the first red flag should’ve been the Playbill, which showed a distressed Ronan pinned to a school desk by this production’s John Proctor, Ben Whishaw. A school desk? But I didn’t notice. I guess I was too excited to be transported into seventeenth century Puritanical Massachusetts to realize that this interpretation would never take me there. For this reason, it came as a shock when the curtain rose on a typical modern classroom. Emphasis on modern. The stage was set with a chalkboard and rows of desks, which faced away from the audience and were occupied by singing school girls, whose eerie song set the tone quite effectively for the rest of the show. Then the curtain goes down and we are thrust into the action of the play- Betty’s sickness and whatnot. I would have to say that these are my favorite part of this adaptation; I loved that van Hove took the liberty to write in several creepy, dark snapshots, including the opening visual, to serve as transitions between the show’s acts and help to maintain the show’s uncertain supernatural theatricality.

I feel that these were particularly necessary given van Hove’s chosen setting for his interpretation. I know, a setting other than the given colonial witchfest sounds impossible given the show’s plot. After all, the setting is as integral to the play as the character of Abigail Williams herself. This is why I feel that van Hove’s schoolhouse location didn’t work. You couldn’t take Rent and set it in a children’s daycare facility just to put a fresher edge on a well known work, so it’s hard to justify van Hove’s placement of The Crucible in a high school (a Catholic one, presumably, given the costuming of Abigail and her minions as archetypical schoolgirls), especially because it’s so inconsistently adapted to this setting. As I mentioned before, Abigail and her friends are dressed in schoolgirl costumes, but none of the adults are dressed as teachers. They missed an opportunity for the setting to actually work by making John Proctor Abigail’s teacher somehow, but instead they just dressed him and the other characters in a fashion reminiscent of SLS’ Godspell production. It also just doesn’t fit when they talk about going off to farm the land while standing in what looks like a New Canaan High School classroom.

What makes this production worth seeing, however, has to be the performances. But it’s not even the top billed Ben Whishaw or Saoirse Ronan whose efforts captivate, it’s the supporting Sophie Okenodo and Tavi Gevinson who steal the show. However much you studied the book in English class, you won’t understand the true importance of Mary Warren or Elizabeth Proctor until you’ve seen these actors bring the roles to life.

In short, The Crucible’s most recent run on the stage doesn’t translate as well as it could, and is strained even more by the high expectations that are tied to the involvement of Ivo van Hove and Saoirse Ronan. If anything, though, go see it at least to be in the same room as Tavi Gevinson as she performs Mary Warren’s iconic meltdown.

–Jack Hobbs, Staff Writer

Posted by on April 13, 2016. Filed under Arts. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

47 Responses to Gold or Mold: van Hove’s Crucible Revival

  1. Pingback: 3d printer

  2. Pingback: microsoft exchange

  3. Pingback: hydroxychloroquine south dakota study

  4. Pingback: hydroxychloroquine manufacturer

  5. Pingback: hydroxychloroquine and cancer

  6. Pingback: exchange mail fiyatı

  7. Pingback: hydroxychloroquine generic name

  8. Pingback: ivermectil dosage amount effects

  9. Pingback: zovirax prescription

  10. Pingback: drugs similar to prednisone

  11. Pingback: priligy 100 mg

  12. Pingback: stromectol for toe infection

  13. Pingback: clomid ovulation tracker

  14. Pingback: how long do priligy last

  15. Pingback: plaquenil and ibuprofen for rosacea therapy

  16. Pingback: กล่องอาหาร

  17. Pingback: an deltasone

  18. Pingback: alternatives to albuterol hfa

  19. Pingback: tadalafil 10mg generic

  20. Pingback: cap stromectol 6

  21. Pingback: stromectol tablet

  22. Pingback: stromectol antiparasitic

  23. Pingback: where to order ivermectin online

  24. Pingback: where can you buy ivermectin pills

  25. Pingback: is ivermectin used to treat scabies

  26. Pingback: rocephin and ampicillin compatibility

  27. Pingback: stromectol 6 for uti

  28. Pingback: ivermectin and cancer

  29. Pingback: cialis one a day with dapoxetine canada

  30. Pingback: ivermectin coronavirus in humans

  31. Pingback: cialis pill identifier

  32. Pingback: tetracycline 500mg uses

  33. Pingback: clomiphene 25mg men

  34. Pingback: ivermectin for scabies adults

  35. Pingback: good rx prednisone 20 mg

  36. Pingback: ivermectin oral dosage for rosacea

  37. Pingback: ivermectin prophylaxis for scabies

  38. Pingback: durvet ivermectin pour on

  39. Pingback: 75 mg sildenafil

  40. Pingback: viagra capsules in india

  41. Pingback: walgreens discount prescriptions

  42. Pingback: how to buy cialis without prescription

  43. Pingback: hydroxychloroquine for sale

  44. Pingback: where can you buy viagra over the counter in canada

  45. Pingback: soolantra for sale online mexico

  46. Pingback: generic tadalafil usa

  47. Pingback: over counter viagra walgreens

You must be logged in to post a comment Login